| 1 |
On Friday, February 13, 2009 09:15:18 Guillaume Castagnino wrote: |
| 2 |
> In fact, no: glibc-2.9 was allready keyworded on hardened ~x86 in the |
| 3 |
> portage tree, and not masked until 2009-02-11. |
| 4 |
> So ~x86 hardened was naturally upgraded to glibc 2.9 without any |
| 5 |
> intervention. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
And naturally if you're running ~ARCH you should know how to |
| 9 |
manipulate /etc/portage. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> I have no problem to package.unmask it, it's just to know what is the |
| 12 |
> reason for this mask :) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Because sys-libs/glibc-2.8 is about to go stable and stable hardened is not |
| 15 |
ready for it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> But keep in mind that for ~x86 hardened, this mask has a dependency |
| 18 |
> problem, since ~x86 iproute2 depends on glibc that is now masked on |
| 19 |
> ~x86 hardened (and was not before 2009-02-11) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
So put sys-libs/glibc into /etc/portage/package.unmask. |
Archives