| 1 |
Le vendredi 13 février 2009 18:48:03, Gordon Malm a écrit : |
| 2 |
> On Friday, February 13, 2009 09:15:18 Guillaume Castagnino wrote: |
| 3 |
> > In fact, no: glibc-2.9 was allready keyworded on hardened ~x86 in the |
| 4 |
> > portage tree, and not masked until 2009-02-11. |
| 5 |
> > So ~x86 hardened was naturally upgraded to glibc 2.9 without any |
| 6 |
> > intervention. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> And naturally if you're running ~ARCH you should know how to |
| 9 |
> manipulate /etc/portage. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> > I have no problem to package.unmask it, it's just to know what is the |
| 12 |
> > reason for this mask :) |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Because sys-libs/glibc-2.8 is about to go stable and stable hardened is not |
| 15 |
> ready for it. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> > But keep in mind that for ~x86 hardened, this mask has a dependency |
| 18 |
> > problem, since ~x86 iproute2 depends on glibc that is now masked on |
| 19 |
> > ~x86 hardened (and was not before 2009-02-11) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> So put sys-libs/glibc into /etc/portage/package.unmask. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Yes of course. |
| 24 |
I perfectly know how to do to fix this problem *for me* as ~arch user for many |
| 25 |
years. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
But what I want to point, is that currently, depdency tree seems to be broken |
| 29 |
for ~x86 : some packages in the ~x86 tree (iproute2 for example) ask for |
| 30 |
package not available in ~x86 (glibc). |
| 31 |
Doesn't it sounds wrong to have such situation in the official tree ? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Anyway, thanks for your work :) |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Guillaume Castagnino |
| 38 |
guilc@×××××××.net / casta@×××××.info |
Archives