Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: Ed W <lists@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] kernel no longer in hardened-development overlay?
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:02:44
Message-Id: 4BCC8FE7.8050606@wildgooses.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-hardened] kernel no longer in hardened-development overlay? by "Joseph C. Lininger"
1 On 19/04/2010 17:53, Joseph C. Lininger wrote:
2 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
3 > Hash: SHA256
4 >
5 > Hey folks,
6 > Has anyone else noticed that the entire hardened-sources package has
7 > vanished from the hardened-development overlay? I know it's a
8 > development overlay and all, but I figured I should mention it because
9 > it's just gone. All versions. It struck me as a bit odd. Any reason for
10 > this?
11 >
12
13
14 I guess others will disagree, but I have never been a huge fan of the
15 kernel ebuilds. I'm just not clear what they buy you over downloading
16 and compiling your own? I think there are a few extra patches in the
17 case of gentoo-sources, but that seems to be about it?
18
19
20 If you don't yet have an alternative in place then my choice is for the
21 vserver+grsec patches that you can grab from the linux-vserver.org site
22 and this gives you a very easy way to setup chroot style jails with
23 lightweight virtualisation, plus all the grsec patches. If you just
24 want Pax then it's a fast moving target and you are best to grab and
25 patch your own kernel anyway, and don't forget to keep an archive of pax
26 patches used since they don't archive them on the site (annoying if you
27 are trying to diff the diff or whatever)
28
29
30 I realise everyone has different needs, but perhaps try pulling your own
31 kernel down and applying your own patches - I think it's about easier to
32 maintain in most cases?
33
34 Good luck
35
36 Ed W

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-hardened] kernel no longer in hardened-development overlay? Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com>