| 1 |
> here I am :) I had a nice irc chat on #gentoo-hardened today. |
| 2 |
> I'm in touch with one of the irc people, it seems he can help |
| 3 |
> in debugging, otherwise I'll need some time to setup a |
| 4 |
> gentoo-hardened box (and read some docs). |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> If somebody could file a detailed bug report I'll have a |
| 7 |
> starting point. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
ok, welcome on board then ;-). this |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=109020239200001&r=1&w=2 |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
is all i know myself plus some debugging i did here. from the strace |
| 14 |
report it seems that the problem is triggered after/while loading |
| 15 |
libsys_acpi.so which in turn makes me think that maybe some PIE |
| 16 |
code ended up in it and caused a problem. when i took a brief look |
| 17 |
at the compilation it seemed that most files were compiled with |
| 18 |
-fPIC which turns off PIE enforcement, but i haven't thoroughly |
| 19 |
checked all object files that were linked into this library, so |
| 20 |
something could have slipped in - this should be one of the first |
| 21 |
things to check out (alternatively you could just keep a non-PIE |
| 22 |
compiled .so around and use it with the PIE cpufreqd and see how |
| 23 |
that fares). |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives