| 1 |
Shouldn't go to 4.10+, because it will be too much work. |
| 2 |
Best would be to maintain 4.9 LTS and not bother with 4.10 and all that. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On 05/01/2017 04:53 PM, Daniel Cegiełka wrote: |
| 6 |
> 2017-05-01 16:20 GMT+02:00 SK <yandereson@××××××.net>: |
| 7 |
>> There is Subgraph that is going to keep maintaining 4.9.X LTS branch |
| 8 |
>> with grsec & there is minipli[1] that is going to forward 4.9.X LTS |
| 9 |
>> branch with grsec. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> Would be great to join forces to keep 4.9.X LTS alive while porting |
| 12 |
>> features upstream. |
| 13 |
> 4.9.* is not a problem, but >=4.10 requires a lot of work, and of |
| 14 |
> course there is a problem with the KSPP (links kernel.org) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-hardened/message/e0f9f37be6c5985acd2f19a316a6fee0 |
| 17 |
> |
Archives