Archives
Archives
| From: | "Daniel Cegiełka" <daniel.cegielka@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] Technical repercussions of grsecurity removal | ||
| Date: | Mon, 01 May 2017 14:54:14 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAPLrYERkjXy7R8f7PWVuQqTW4EUiSbbhAZE6qKxWL3UQWa38AA@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] Technical repercussions of grsecurity removal by SK |
||
| 1 | 2017-05-01 16:20 GMT+02:00 SK <yandereson@××××××.net>: |
| 2 | > There is Subgraph that is going to keep maintaining 4.9.X LTS branch |
| 3 | > with grsec & there is minipli[1] that is going to forward 4.9.X LTS |
| 4 | > branch with grsec. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > Would be great to join forces to keep 4.9.X LTS alive while porting |
| 7 | > features upstream. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | 4.9.* is not a problem, but >=4.10 requires a lot of work, and of |
| 10 | course there is a problem with the KSPP (links kernel.org) |
| 11 | |
| 12 | https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-hardened/message/e0f9f37be6c5985acd2f19a316a6fee0 |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-hardened] Technical repercussions of grsecurity removal | SK <yandereson@××××××.net> |