| 1 |
On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 08:31, Ed Wildgoose wrote: |
| 2 |
> Aaron Walker wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> >I noticed that after upgrading to gcc-3.3.3-r3, while emerging things, I |
| 5 |
> >get lots of "-pie: unrecognized option" messages. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> >Has the use of -pie in LDFLAGS been deprecated? If so, in favor of |
| 8 |
> >what? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Yes.. |
| 11 |
It's been deprecated in favor of gcc patches and proper documentation. |
| 12 |
3/4 of which is still pending. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Anybody love to document things? :) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I believe that with gcc3.3.3-r2 onwards you just need the USE="hardened" |
| 20 |
> flag to get the old behaviour... I asked a similar question a few days |
| 21 |
> back if you want to check the archives. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Perhaps someone who knows what they are talking about could positively |
| 24 |
> confirm this though! |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I'll confirm for you that -r4 will be the desired gcc to use as soon as |
| 27 |
I make some changes. -r3 has some undesirable bugs which are fixed in |
| 28 |
the -* masked -r4. |
| 29 |
However the -r4 has it's own unique set of problems with |
| 30 |
some patch offsets that are not playing along unless USE=uclibc is set. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
In short.. Give it a week. I've got other things on my plate like trying |
| 33 |
to raise funds to feed myself which must take priority and thus I can't |
| 34 |
dive into gcc right away. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
> Ed W |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> -- |
| 39 |
> gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 42 |
Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer |
Archives