| 1 |
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 15:13 +0200, Felix Tiede wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ned Ludd schrieb: |
| 3 |
> > On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 18:14 -0500, dkurtz wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> >>Thanks for revamping syslog-ng.conf to include grsec & pax |
| 6 |
> >>filters... (et al.) |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > glad you like it. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I certainly like it too, but there's a small pitfall: I had to adapt |
| 12 |
> logwatch's config by hand to the "new" layout. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Wasn't a hard task after finding out, how logwatch is configured, but |
| 15 |
> unfortunately, logwatch is not as good documented as is syslog-ng. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> So this is just a suggestion: Could someone revise logwatch-config and do |
| 18 |
> something similar to syslog-ng with logwatch? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
My thinking on this is that you have already done the work yourself |
| 21 |
locally and already know whats wrong with it. |
| 22 |
So I think you should file a bug with a diff/patch attached for |
| 23 |
>=logwatch-6.0.2 |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives