1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
One minor update: |
4 |
|
5 |
Although mozilla-firefox was compiled with fnostack-protector-all, |
6 |
kdebase kdadmin and kdenetwork weren't.I suspect i was to |
7 |
soon with my e-mail.Unfortunately that mozilla-firefox can't be |
8 |
compiled with the fstack compiler flag,firefox is i think the one |
9 |
who's most targeted on a workstation/desktop. |
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
On 8/3/05, Kevin F. Quinn <kevquinn@g.o> wrote: |
13 |
> On 3/8/2005 11:08:10, netpython (phaceton@×××××.com) wrote: |
14 |
> |
15 |
> > I have just installed gentoo-amd64 with hardened-sources and both |
16 |
> > Grsecurity and Pax features enabled to a point that xorg still is |
17 |
> > functional.In some gentoo doc's i read there's the CFLAG |
18 |
> > -fstack-protector-all. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> There is, but you don't want to add it to CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf. You need to use the hardened gcc, which will avoid enabling the stack protector in situations where it should be off. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> > Since i now get -fnostack-protector-all when i |
23 |
> > compile packages |
24 |
> |
25 |
> I don't understand why you're seeing '-fno-stack-protector-all' while compiling. |
26 |
> Can you provide an example (i.e. name of package being emerged, some relevant lines from the compilation output), and include also the output of 'emerge info'? |
27 |
> |
28 |
> > i decided to maunally add the fstack-protector-all |
29 |
> > flag to /etc/make.conf.But the fnostack-protector-all flag comes right |
30 |
> > after.Which setting is now valid? |
31 |
> |
32 |
> The current supported way to use the stack protector is to build stuff with hardened gcc (USE="hardened" emerge gcc). |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
> |
36 |
> |
37 |
> -- |
38 |
> gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
39 |
> |
40 |
> |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |