| 1 |
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 20:35 +0100, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:18:46 -0500 |
| 3 |
> Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 17:59 +0000, Ed W wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > Heads up then that when switching compiler to the non-hardened one |
| 7 |
> > > it makes sense to blow away the ccache of disable it's use. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > That probably makes sense for any time a gcc-config switch happens. |
| 10 |
> > You should probably file a bug about that for the maintainer of |
| 11 |
> > gcc-config. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> ccache doesn't take account of anything other than the built-in specs |
| 14 |
> files and stuff specified via --specs - we could just patch |
| 15 |
> ccache to pay attention to GCC_SPECS as well. I'll take a look. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Ok cool but keep in mind. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
USE=-hardened emerge gcc |
| 20 |
gcc-config 1 |
| 21 |
echo $GCC_SPECS |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
USE=hardened emerge gcc |
| 24 |
gcc-config 1 |
| 25 |
echo $GCC_SPECS |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Both times it shall be "" with the same version of gcc. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 32 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives