| 1 |
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:18:46 -0500 |
| 2 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 17:59 +0000, Ed W wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Heads up then that when switching compiler to the non-hardened one |
| 6 |
> > it makes sense to blow away the ccache of disable it's use. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> That probably makes sense for any time a gcc-config switch happens. |
| 9 |
> You should probably file a bug about that for the maintainer of |
| 10 |
> gcc-config. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
ccache doesn't take account of anything other than the built-in specs |
| 13 |
files and stuff specified via --specs - we could just patch |
| 14 |
ccache to pay attention to GCC_SPECS as well. I'll take a look. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Kevin F. Quinn |
Archives