| 1 |
On Pén, Február 15, 2008 05:14, Geoff Kassel wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hmm... I didn't know that you could restore a process fully from a core |
| 3 |
> dump - |
| 4 |
> hence the question. (My ignorance is showing again :) How interesting. In |
| 5 |
> that case, there is no difference between the process image serialisation |
| 6 |
> and |
| 7 |
> the coredump, so I'm sorry for wasting your time on that hypothetical. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Called post-mortem analysis. No tricks, just gdb. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Is such a real-time removal of protections possible with the way PaX is |
| 13 |
> currently implemented? If not, I think it'd be an interesting feature in |
| 14 |
> the |
| 15 |
> eventuality of such a process suspension feature being developed. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Please take a look at paxctl (there's an ebuild for it). MPROTECT can be |
| 18 |
also fine-tuned on a per-process basis. The mechanism is not real-time, |
| 19 |
the changes should be applied before running. However the settings are |
| 20 |
preserved. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Regards, |
| 23 |
Dw. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus Szakorvos jelölt, 06-20-825-8057, 06-30-5962-962 |
| 27 |
Attila Toth MD, Radiologist in Training, +36-20-825-8057, +36-30-5962-962 |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-hardened@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives