| 1 |
Mattia Dongili wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Hello! |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> <pageexec@...> writes: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>>>>Thanks for your help everyone, should I still submit a bug report? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> [...] |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
>>well, i don't actually know if the problem is with cpufreqd or the |
| 14 |
>>toolchain (PIE enforcement), better not rush with that bugreport |
| 15 |
>>upstream (unless they're interested in debugging it nevertheless . |
| 16 |
yow, this is what we can do now. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> here I am :) I had a nice irc chat on #gentoo-hardened today. |
| 21 |
> I'm in touch with one of the irc people, it seems he can help |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
It's not only that i can help in debugging, it's that i am also |
| 24 |
responsible for the hardened gcc doing this and doing that to your poor |
| 25 |
package ;-) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> in debugging, otherwise I'll need some time to setup a |
| 28 |
> gentoo-hardened box (and read some docs). |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
It's always nice to have new users. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> If somebody could file a detailed bug report I'll have a |
| 34 |
> starting point. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
we will see later tonight what we can do about that. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
> Also: I'm subscribed to the list now. |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> thanks |
| 41 |
thank you! |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-Alex |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-- |
| 46 |
Chaos is just a perceptional disorder of reality. |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
-- |
| 49 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives