| 1 |
My 2 cents... |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I like the idea of the addendum format, ensuring that the |
| 4 |
documentation for a hardened install stays current with updated |
| 5 |
generic installation instructions. Options to harden an install as |
| 6 |
part of the generic install process would be a good thing. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I'd also prefer a focus on servers for documentation. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Chris |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 15:48:23 +0200, Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o> wrote: |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> For installation documentation (i.e. install Gentoo/Hardened with SELinux, |
| 15 |
> with grsec, with ...), there are two possible roads to go. The first one is |
| 16 |
> to write and maintain separate installation guides [1]. This is the most |
| 17 |
> user-friendly approach but also the hardest to maintain. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> The second one is to write and maintain an addenda-like guide. This is less |
| 20 |
> user-friendly but a lot more easy to maintain. I'd rather use this approach; |
| 21 |
> perhaps just initially to begin with and later on we can still think about |
| 22 |
> maintaining separate installation guides if you're not happy with the |
| 23 |
> results. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Apart from this, can I focus directly on servers or should I also take |
| 26 |
> workstations as possible target? I'm thinking about the various XFree/X.org |
| 27 |
> difficulties. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives