| 1 |
On 11 Jul 2006 at 18:42, kang wrote: |
| 2 |
> Sorry for the late reply, but actually RSBAC works with both direct and |
| 3 |
> hook. At the time of writting the doc, the author priviligied "direct" |
| 4 |
> and still does AFAIK. Although both seems to work equally well. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> See http://www.rsbac.org/pipermail/rsbac/2006-July/001869.html |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
i took a quick look at patch-linux-2.4.32-rsbac-1.2.7.diff and |
| 9 |
patch-linux-2.6.16.19-rsbac-1.2.7.diff and i don't see where |
| 10 |
the necessary functions are defined (PaX itself declares the |
| 11 |
hook function/ptr, it's up to the ACL system to actually provide |
| 12 |
the definition). i guess i was looking at the wrong patch, maybe |
| 13 |
the OP had the same issue? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives