| 1 |
Kevin F. Quinn wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 18:34:25 +0200 |
| 3 |
> pageexec@××××××××.hu wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> On 4 Jul 2006 at 16:19, Michael Decker wrote: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>>> But I've detect that RSBAC and PAX manual are different, could be |
| 9 |
>>> here an error? (showing only the differences here): |
| 10 |
>>> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/rsbac/quickstart.xml |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>> --- SNIP --- |
| 13 |
>>> PaX Control ---> |
| 14 |
>>> [*] Support soft mode (Turn that option off on a production |
| 15 |
>>> kernel) [ ] Use legacy ELF header marking |
| 16 |
>>> [ ] Use ELF program header marking |
| 17 |
>>> Use ELF program header marking MAC system integration (direct) |
| 18 |
>>> ---> (X) direct |
| 19 |
>>> |
| 20 |
>> the problem is the MAC integration setting, for RSBAC you need |
| 21 |
>> the 'hook' type (i added it explicitly per Amon's request ;-), |
| 22 |
>> and the gentoo guide is wrong on this. the PaX guide suggests |
| 23 |
>> 'none' because it's, well, a PaX-only guide hence there's no |
| 24 |
>> MAC integration. |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Documentation fixed :) |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
Sorry for the late reply, but actually RSBAC works with both direct and |
| 31 |
hook. At the time of writting the doc, the author priviligied "direct" |
| 32 |
and still does AFAIK. Although both seems to work equally well. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
See http://www.rsbac.org/pipermail/rsbac/2006-July/001869.html |
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives