Archives
Archives
| From: | klondike <franxisco1988@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] kudos to hardened-sources | ||
| Date: | Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:09:09 | ||
| Message-Id: | fsp2xe8e8wp1emmibcUYAxe124vaj_firegpg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] kudos to hardened-sources by Ned Ludd |
||
| 1 | 2009/3/24 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> Try not to confuse higher numercial vales for being more advanced. g-s |
| 2 | lacks PaX. So even if h-s were 10 revisions behind, I'd assert our |
| 3 | kernel is still more advanced by light years. I think that's relative. If I want a safe machine hardened is obviously better, now let's say I have an Intel 945GME graphics card and I need framebuffer in that case an higher kernel version would be better. Anyway congratulations, the new kernel works smoothly an all three machines :) |
| 4 |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |