Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] kudos to hardened-sources
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:59:53
Message-Id: 1237928390.6530.4.camel@hangover
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] kudos to hardened-sources by klondike
1 On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 21:06 +0100, klondike wrote:
2 > 2009/3/24 7v5w7go9ub0o <7v5w7go9ub0o@×××××.com>
3 > FWICT, hardened-sources has offered, for a few days now, a
4 > more recent
5 > kernel than gentoo-sources! (not that there's any sort of
6 > competition :-) )
7 >
8 > Good show! (thanks!!)
9 > I'm not going to cite anything because then I may get an out of
10 > context answer :P But I think it was gengor who said that, obviously,
11 > the isn't any kinf of competition, and that the kernel change was just
12 > casuality.
13 >
14 > As a side note, say that the jump was 2.6.26 to 2.6.28 so I think
15 > gentoo sources has been also advanced for some time
16
17 Try not to confuse higher numercial vales for being more advanced. g-s
18 lacks PaX. So even if h-s were 10 revisions behind, I'd assert our
19 kernel is still more advanced by light years.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-hardened] kudos to hardened-sources klondike <franxisco1988@×××××.com>