| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Hi :) |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On Friday 07 March 2003 22:03, Joshua Brindle wrote: |
| 7 |
> Here we are |
| 8 |
> [...] |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Ah, great! |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
My current todo: |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
* Get working support for crypt_blowfish (with a blowfish USE flag to |
| 15 |
control whether blowfish or MD5 should be used by crypt(3)) |
| 16 |
* Get working support for tcb (controlled by tcb USE flag) |
| 17 |
* Write a short RFC on a framework for default grsecurity ACLs (I'll |
| 18 |
probably steal some of Method's work here) |
| 19 |
* Patch up various packages with patches from Owl (chrooting, privilege |
| 20 |
separation, etc. I'll compile a list of packages some day) |
| 21 |
* Probably a lot more, but I can't remember any more items right now. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
What are your thoughts on how we can control gentoo-hardened packages? |
| 24 |
I proposed an approval keyword a while ago, but the response wasn't very |
| 25 |
positive. Besides, I guess it would demand a new portage feature (being |
| 26 |
able to only approve packages with both arch and hardened keyword). Any |
| 27 |
ideas? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
P.S: Please excuse my english, I'm damn tired right now :P |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
- -- |
| 32 |
Joachim Blaabjerg |
| 33 |
Gentoo Linux Security Developer |
| 34 |
GPG key @ http://cvs.gentoo.org/~styx |
| 35 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 36 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
iD8DBQE+aQzLFJKdDpq6hFsRAoO0AJsFqaIcZZUgYmQaPTouHf07v93MEQCfXd+m |
| 39 |
g3Si0XRv97RDsLYn+PD/7OU= |
| 40 |
=G9yD |
| 41 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives