1 |
Gordon Malm wrote: |
2 |
> On Tuesday, September 15, 2009 04:46:13 Tom Hendrikx wrote: |
3 |
>> Hi, |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> As of today, portage notifies me that my current profile (hardened/x86) |
6 |
>> is deprecated, and that "hardened/linux/x86/10.0" is the suggested |
7 |
>> replacement. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> A few months ago, there was some traffic on this list regarding |
10 |
>> profiles, resulting in the conclusion that "hardened/x86" was to be |
11 |
>> preferred above the default as set (by releng?) in the hardened stages: |
12 |
>> "hardened/linux/x86", as the latter was not approved or checked by the |
13 |
>> hardened project. |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> How does the new profile differ from hardened/x86, and is the new |
16 |
>> profile tested/approved by the hardened project? |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> -- |
19 |
>> Regards, |
20 |
>> Tom |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Hi Tom, |
23 |
> |
24 |
> You are correct, the hardened/linux/${arch} profiles were born by releng. |
25 |
> Hardened project took them over some time ago however and have been |
26 |
> maintaining both profile sets in parallel. The time has come to pair that |
27 |
> down to a single set of profiles again; thus the older hardened/${arch} |
28 |
> profiles have been deprecated. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> The hardened/linux/${arch}/10.0 profiles are tested/approved by the hardened |
31 |
> team. Please file a bug if you run into problems. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Gordon Malm (gengor) |
34 |
> |
35 |
|
36 |
Great, and thanks for the info, and the effort. Testing will commence today. |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
Regards, |
40 |
Tom |