| 1 |
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Sunday 06 August 2006 07:17, Peter S. Mazinger wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > > ssp may or may |
| 5 |
> > > > not be a good idea given how new the 4.x series is, but as Mike said, |
| 6 |
> > > > at least there's an eager upstream to fix any issues. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > toolchain.eclass misses the needed support for gcc-4.1 like ssp |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> you cant just make statements like this without details ... |
| 11 |
> `gcc -fstack-protector` works just fine with gcc-4.1 |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> i imagine you're referring to pie patchsets and split specs ? |
| 14 |
not only, toolchain.eclass (the ssp related functions) fail if someone |
| 15 |
tries to compile with a gcc that defaults to -pie -ssp (hardened profile) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Peter |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Peter S. Mazinger <ps dot m at gmx dot net> ID: 0xA5F059F2 |
| 21 |
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2 |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives