| 1 |
On Sunday 06 August 2006 07:17, Peter S. Mazinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> > > ssp may or may |
| 3 |
> > > not be a good idea given how new the 4.x series is, but as Mike said, |
| 4 |
> > > at least there's an eager upstream to fix any issues. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> toolchain.eclass misses the needed support for gcc-4.1 like ssp |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
you cant just make statements like this without details ... |
| 9 |
`gcc -fstack-protector` works just fine with gcc-4.1 |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
i imagine you're referring to pie patchsets and split specs ? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> > I think the major problem we are facing here is how to cleanly upgrade |
| 14 |
> > from 3.x to 4.x. symbol names have changed. And using the stub/aliases |
| 15 |
> > method Peter used in uClibc svn allows the __guard to be overwritten. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> How can __guard be overwritten, it is even marked with attribute_relro? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
not overriding the symbol, overriding the value |
| 20 |
-mike |
Archives