Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: "Peter S. Mazinger" <ps.m@×××.net>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] SSP + setjmp() = badness?
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 10:31:24
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.44.0608131226190.6971-100000@lnx.bridge.intra
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] SSP + setjmp() = badness? by Mike Frysinger
1 On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2
3 > On Sunday 06 August 2006 07:17, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
4 > > > > ssp may or may
5 > > > > not be a good idea given how new the 4.x series is, but as Mike said,
6 > > > > at least there's an eager upstream to fix any issues.
7 > >
8 > > toolchain.eclass misses the needed support for gcc-4.1 like ssp
9 >
10 > you cant just make statements like this without details ...
11
12 I have sent you months ago the diff for toolchain.eclass to support it,
13 the details are there ...
14
15 Peter
16
17 --
18 Peter S. Mazinger <ps dot m at gmx dot net> ID: 0xA5F059F2
19 Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2
20
21 --
22 gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list