Archives
Archives
| From: | Sven Vermeulen <sven.vermeulen@××××××.be> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] SELinux bughunt | ||
| Date: | Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:55:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAPzO=Nx3Zd=mq6SrsuvPHO+SsxEHGDLN3tLONtGUyfmTcyA+fw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] SELinux bughunt by Chris Richards |
||
| 1 | On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Chris Richards <gizmo@×××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Is there not already a standard definition of what these statuses mean? |
| 4 | > If so, why not use that, rather than defining our own definitions within |
| 5 | > the SELinux team? |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | There is, and the definition I gave earlier matches on it. Problem is that |
| 9 | the definitions are ambiguous. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Wkr, |
| 12 | Sven Vermeulen |