| 1 |
On Thu, July 21, 2011 5:06 am, Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi guys, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> The SELinux bugs are "piling" up but most of them are resolved and I'd |
| 5 |
> like to |
| 6 |
> use the STATUS field to keep track of which bugs are actually still |
| 7 |
> open... |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Considering the available states in the status field in bugzilla, I think |
| 10 |
> it |
| 11 |
> is a nice idea to say: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Is there not already a standard definition of what these statuses mean? |
| 14 |
If so, why not use that, rather than defining our own definitions within |
| 15 |
the SELinux team? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Later, |
| 18 |
Gizmo |
Archives