| 1 |
can be done when the specs file uses ssp.o containing glibc independent |
| 2 |
__guard and __stack_smash_handler |
| 3 |
i already said i will work on it, i promise ;-) |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
if hardened-gcc can support native kernel compiling, such kernel patches |
| 6 |
would be not needed any more also. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
how is uclib going? |
| 9 |
do you also plan on dietlibc? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
TIA, |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Alex |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 16:03, Peter S. Mazinger wrote: |
| 17 |
> Hello! |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Has someone tried to build kernel-2.4.x with gcc-3.3.2 and |
| 20 |
> -fstack-protector -fstack-protector-all? The patch included in hardened |
| 21 |
> defines only -fstack-protector (for gcc < 3.3). |
| 22 |
> Should also the -fforce-addr option be used too (as in gcc-3.3.2 |
| 23 |
> hardened)? |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Peter |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives