Re: [gentoo-hardened] binary protection mechanisms in different Linux distros

[Matthew Thode]

Also, here is a png of it running on all processes (I haven't rebooted this
server).  I also included one of a rebooted server.  I thing the ruby and
python processes skew this a bit.

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 20:07, Matthew Thode <mthode@××××××.org> wrote:

> Here is the output of the script with gcc 4.4.4-r1.
>
>
> sh checksec.sh --file /bin/grep
> RELRO           STACK CANARY      NX            PIE
> FILE
> Full RELRO      Canary found      NX enabled    PIE enabled
> /bin/grep
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 19:12, Radoslaw Madej <radegand@××.pl> wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 01 July 2010 22:09:24 you wrote:
>> >
>> > Which was mentioned in TFA, my bad.
>>
>> Yep, I'm well aware of this script as this was a base of a python script I
>> developed for this exercise - which apart from adding RELRO checks was
>> meant
>> to do some stats automatically so I didn't have to do any grep | sed | awk
>> |
>> wc magic ;)
>> I will publish it soon, too, hopefully :)
>> Regards,
>> Radek Madej
>>
>>
>