| 1 |
On Vas, Április 12, 2009 02:03, Grant wrote: |
| 2 |
>> If you employ GRsecurity's RBAC, you can use PAX flags, like |
| 3 |
>> "PAX_MPROTECT" on a given subject (binary). Take a look at on the |
| 4 |
>> example |
| 5 |
>> policy file. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Do you guys think RBAC or /etc/portage/bashrc is a better choice for |
| 8 |
> this? Maybe RBAC is overkill if this is all I'll be using it for? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
It takes time to refine a policy and it needs some tuning from time to |
| 12 |
time. If you haven't utilized any RBAC (Grsecurity, RSBAC) on your system |
| 13 |
yet, it's high time to give it a try. |
| 14 |
So I should say, that bashrc is not the best choice from the security |
| 15 |
point of view, but in the mean time it's not an overkill either... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Regards: |
| 18 |
Dw. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
>>>>>> and create executable shell script in that dir: |
| 22 |
>>>>>> mozilla-firefox-bin.postinst |
| 23 |
>>>>>> ---cut--- |
| 24 |
>>>>>> #!/bin/bash |
| 25 |
>>>>>> ewarn "Running chpax -m /opt/firefox/firefox-bin to avoid crash on |
| 26 |
>>>>>> flash!" |
| 27 |
>>>>>> chpax -m /opt/firefox/firefox-bin |
| 28 |
>>>>>> ---cut--- |
| 29 |
>>>>>> |
| 30 |
>>>>> |
| 31 |
>>>>> Of course, if you compile firefox instead of using firefox-bin, then |
| 32 |
>>>>> file |
| 33 |
>>>>> should be named mozilla-firefox.postinst and you should use there |
| 34 |
>>>>> paxctl |
| 35 |
>>>>> instead of chpax. |
| 36 |
>>>>> |
| 37 |
>>>> A simple cron job or slightly-less-simple RBAC policy can do the |
| 38 |
>>>> trick. |
| 39 |
>>>> There's no need to mess with portage, imho. |
| 40 |
>>> |
| 41 |
>>> Thanks for the suggestions everyone. I think this type of persistence |
| 42 |
>>> should be built into portage. Maybe /etc/portage/package.nomprotect. |
| 43 |
>>> Do you agree? Should I file a bug? |
| 44 |
>>> |
| 45 |
>>> - Grant |
| 46 |
> |
Archives