Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Hardened laptop: am I nuts?
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:02:08
Message-Id: 49bf44f10712050859x23127599y820a5eebd14766ac@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Hardened laptop: am I nuts? by pageexec@freemail.hu
1 > > > ok, another idea: have you got /lib/ld-linux.so.2 on your system? it's
2 > > > needed for dynamically linked apps, i think it's in emul-linux-x86-compat.
3 > >
4 > > I do not have ld-linux.so.2 anywhere on my system but
5 > > emul-linux-x86-compat is installed. The ELOG for that package says
6 > > files are only installed in /usr/lib32/ and the closest things to
7 > > ld-linux.so.2 are /usr/lib32/ld-linux.so.1.9.11 and
8 > > /usr/lib32/ld-linux.so.1. I Googled but I can't figure out which
9 > > package ld-linux.so.2 belongs to. Any other package ideas?
10 >
11 > ok, so that's your problem (missing interpreter for 32 bit binaries),
12 > and i was wrong, it doesn't come from that package but glibc itself,
13 > provided you have a multilib enabled profile (or USE flag?) - do you?
14
15 No! Is that the problem? USE=multilib has no effect because they are
16 all (-multilib). Should I switch my profile from:
17
18 /usr/portage/profiles/hardened/amd64
19
20 to:
21
22 /usr/portage/profiles/hardened/amd64/multilib
23
24 ?
25
26 > > > on a sidenote, the RPATH in qtwengophone is a disaster, someone should
27 > > > let them know...
28 > >
29 > > Is it a Gentoo problem or upstream?
30 >
31 > since wengophone is binary only, obviously it's their problem ;).
32
33 OK, I'm not familiar with RPATH.
34
35 - Grant
36 --
37 gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-hardened] Hardened laptop: am I nuts? pageexec@××××××××.hu