| 1 |
Why do you want to remove all rsbac related documentation?, I think is |
| 2 |
a non-sense to do this. Documentation does not harm anybody and in |
| 3 |
case of rsbac is almost nonexistent . |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I'm an rsbac user (maybe one of the last) and a gentoo hardened one, I |
| 6 |
have never used gentoo rsbac ebuilds, so for me is not any kind of |
| 7 |
change. |
| 8 |
Maybe you could put your opinion in the main page of the mandatory |
| 9 |
access controls related (something like rsbac is not longer maintained |
| 10 |
in gentoo so we suggest you to change to by this reason and this one |
| 11 |
and this one.... blahblahblah). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
2008/12/29 Gordon Malm <gengor@g.o>: |
| 16 |
> Hi all, |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Hardened Gentoo has been without an RSBAC maintainer for quite a long time |
| 19 |
> now. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Support for RSBAC in Hardened Gentoo is discontinued effective immediately. |
| 22 |
> RSBAC-related ebuilds, bugs and documents will begin being purged starting |
| 23 |
> January 31st, 2009. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> All users of RSBAC in Hardened Gentoo who require mandatory or role based |
| 26 |
> access control are strongly encouraged to migrate to Grsecurity's RBAC or |
| 27 |
> SELinux at this time. Anyone wishing to continue using RSBAC will be without |
| 28 |
> support from the Hardened Gentoo project. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> The RSBAC project itself continues as normal @ http://www.rsbac.org. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Sincerely, |
| 33 |
> Gordon Malm (gengor) |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> |
Archives