| 1 |
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 5:34 AM, Alex Efros <powerman@××××××××.name> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi! |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:28:27PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 5 |
>> My plan then is as follows. I'll wait one more month and then send out |
| 6 |
>> a news item and later mask hardened-sources for removal. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Well, it's about a month now. I didn't replied earlier because others |
| 9 |
> already mentioned all good ideas and I was hoping these ideas will be |
| 10 |
> accepted… :( |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> But, just in case, I'm +1 for both ideas to keep 4.9 LTS support as long |
| 13 |
> as possible (and mark one of hardened-sources-4.9.x as stable) to give us |
| 14 |
> a couple of years [...] |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I agree, there are this solution seems popular among people using |
| 18 |
other distributions who want to continue to use grsecurity. |
Archives