1 |
Ditto.. woohoo, life is good again. |
2 |
|
3 |
Chris PeBenito wrote: |
4 |
> This is a sandbox problem. The sandbox in the stable portage breaks |
5 |
> some coreutils programs now that libselinux is compiled with 64bit |
6 |
> offsets. On a non-PaX system, this would simply segfault. The |
7 |
> packages you want are: |
8 |
> |
9 |
>> =sys-apps/portage-2.0.51.21 =sys-apps/sandbox-1.2.2 |
10 |
|
11 |
I noticed this too.. that once I was booting my new kernel (with pax) |
12 |
that my emerges stop segfaulting and started showing as 'killed'. |
13 |
|
14 |
I'm emerging again and things look good. Thanks much for the info. |
15 |
|
16 |
I didnt want to run ~x86 masked portage or sandbox so all I've done is |
17 |
add FEATURES="-sandbox". Then emerge libselinux-1.22-r1 by doing |
18 |
`emerge -vuD world` after I sync'd. |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Jason K Larson |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
Julian Rendell wrote: |
25 |
> Thanks Chris- you've just reduced my frustration levels back to |
26 |
> healthy levels ;-) (I've spent a few hours today trying to figure |
27 |
> out where things were going wrong; got as far as the first mergeme in |
28 |
> portage.py, to a mystery seg fault- didn't quite figure out the root |
29 |
> cause though.) |
30 |
> |
31 |
> I'm using the stage3 tarballs. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> I added FEATURES="-sandbox" to /etc/make.conf, and was able to emerge |
34 |
> portage, sandbox, and libselinux. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> I then re-enabled the sandbox, and have just been able to emerge |
37 |
> 'less' (figured it'd be relatively small/fast)- and it worked. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> Any chance a note could be added in to the SELinux handbook, at least |
40 |
> until the boot CD is re-generated? |
41 |
> |
42 |
> Thanks again, |
43 |
> |
44 |
> Julian |
45 |
> |
46 |
-- |
47 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |