| 1 |
Hi Tad, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Ah, I begin to see the light. Thanks! |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Do you think I can get away with giving the user staff_r rather than |
| 6 |
sysadm_r? I'm going to try that first, on the theory that less is best <g>. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Cheers, |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
--On Monday, January 12, 2004 10:20 PM -0800 Tad <tadglines@×××××××.net> |
| 11 |
wrote: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Did you use newrole to change roles to sysadm_r before trying su? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
>> -----Original Message----- |
| 16 |
>> From: Bill McCarty [mailto:bmccarty@××××××.net] |
| 17 |
>> I recently set up SELinux under Gentoo and find that SELinux is |
| 18 |
>> prohibiting |
| 19 |
>> ordinary users from running su. Is this intentional? Since I generally |
| 20 |
>> prohibit root logins via SSH, access to su is important to me; I cannot |
| 21 |
>> otherwise administer the system remotely. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
--------------------------------------------------- |
| 24 |
Bill McCarty |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Archives