Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: Tad <tadglines@×××××××.net>
To: 'Bill McCarty' <bmccarty@××××××.net>, gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: RE: [gentoo-hardened] su command
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 06:21:06
Message-Id: 002301c3d99d$57ac0510$0301a8c0@sprite
In Reply to: [gentoo-hardened] su command by Bill McCarty
1 Did you use newrole to change roles to sysadm_r before trying su?
2
3 -Tad
4
5 > -----Original Message-----
6 > From: Bill McCarty [mailto:bmccarty@××××××.net]
7 > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:12 PM
8 > To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
9 > Subject: [gentoo-hardened] su command
10 >
11 > Hi all,
12 >
13 > I recently set up SELinux under Gentoo and find that SELinux is
14 > prohibiting
15 > ordinary users from running su. Is this intentional? Since I generally
16 > prohibit root logins via SSH, access to su is important to me; I cannot
17 > otherwise administer the system remotely.
18 >
19 > I'm using pam-0.77, which is the version that I understand to be
20 > SELinux-compliant. The users have context user_u:user_r:user_t and the su
21 > executable has context system_u:object_r:su_exec_t. Where else might I
22 > look
23 > for a possible error in my configuration?
24 >
25 > The possibility that makes me most anxious is that I may have too recent a
26 > version of some ebuild that should be security-aware. I find setting
27 > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" a bit scary <g>. Is there a list of known good
28 > ebuild versions, or should I check the Changelog of each ebuild?
29 >
30 > Thanks for any suggestions!
31 >
32 > Cheers,
33 >
34 > ---------------------------------------------------
35 > Bill McCarty
36 >
37 >
38 > --
39 > gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list
40
41
42 --
43 gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
RE: [gentoo-hardened] su command Bill McCarty <bmccarty@××××××.net>