| 1 |
On Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:47:32 +0000 |
| 2 |
Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Hi all |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Is it ok if I create a branch in the hardened-dev repo (called |
| 7 |
> "selinux-userland") which contains the patches for the various SELinux |
| 8 |
> userland packages we maintain? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Or would you prefer a different way to centrally manage the patches |
| 11 |
> (they sometimes become too large to be put in the ${FILESDIR} so I |
| 12 |
> moved towards a patchbundle)? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Wkr, |
| 15 |
> Sven Vermeulen |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Are these only patches or packages? |
| 19 |
If only patches I think it's better to put them in separate repository. |
| 20 |
Mainly because hardened-dev is used for portage tree stuff and some |
| 21 |
other parts of hardened (proj/hardened-gccpatchset.git |
| 22 |
proj/hardened-patchset.git) keep patches separately. |
| 23 |
Perhaps hardened-selinuxpatchset? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Amadeusz |
Archives