| 1 |
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:26:58 +0300 |
| 2 |
Alex Efros <powerman@××××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> I think users should decide which level of security they need. Choice |
| 5 |
> between 'don't use hardened' or 'don't use nvidia drivers' sounds very |
| 6 |
> undesirable. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Indeed, however I think we should be providing a hardened profile that |
| 9 |
as far as is reasonable filters out stuff that involves a compromise |
| 10 |
where the user can make a choice. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> [...] |
| 13 |
> But, as far as I understand, it isn't "that drastic" because user can |
| 14 |
> just unmask nvidia drivers and continue using both hardened and |
| 15 |
> nvidia drivers..? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Yes; the mask is deliberately in the profile package.mask so that you |
| 18 |
can do this. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Kevin F. Quinn |
Archives