Archives
Archives
| From: | Greg KH <gregkh@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-kernel@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-kernel] vanilla-kernel sources should not be marked stable for obsolete versions | ||
| Date: | Fri, 21 Jun 2013 17:50:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130621175054.GA13534@kroah.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-kernel] vanilla-kernel sources should not be marked stable for obsolete versions by "Eric F. GARIOUD" |
||
| 1 | On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 07:20:23PM +0200, Eric F. GARIOUD wrote: |
| 2 | > On Friday 21 June 2013 18:48:41 Greg KH wrote: |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > > We should _never_ have an end-of-life kernel marked stable, that's just |
| 5 | > > asking for trouble. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > What about keeping the stable mark and add a package mask? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | And when does that mask get changed? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | greg k-h |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-kernel] vanilla-kernel sources should not be marked stable for obsolete versions | "Eric F. GARIOUD" <eric-f.garioud@×××××××.fr> |