From: | "Eric F. GARIOUD" <eric-f.garioud@×××××××.fr> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-kernel@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-kernel] vanilla-kernel sources should not be marked stable for obsolete versions | ||
Date: | Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:51:20 | ||
Message-Id: | 201306212151.53453.eric-f.garioud@wanadoo.fr | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-kernel] vanilla-kernel sources should not be marked stable for obsolete versions by Greg KH |
1 | On Friday 21 June 2013 19:50:54 Greg KH wrote: |
2 | > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 07:20:23PM +0200, Eric F. GARIOUD wrote: |
3 | > > On Friday 21 June 2013 18:48:41 Greg KH wrote: |
4 | > > > We should _never_ have an end-of-life kernel marked stable, that's just |
5 | > > > asking for trouble. |
6 | > > |
7 | > > What about keeping the stable mark and add a package mask? |
8 | > |
9 | > And when does that mask get changed? |
10 | |
11 | Never! |
12 | The next step being to drop the ebuild. |
13 | |
14 | After all, that is what is currently being done with, as an example, |
15 | avidemux-2.5.6-r2 |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-kernel] vanilla-kernel sources should not be marked stable for obsolete versions | Greg KH <gregkh@g.o> |