| 1 |
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 02:18:12AM -0400, Douglas Dunn wrote: |
| 2 |
> A users perspective about vanilla-kernel, but why not just mirror whats |
| 3 |
> available on kernel.org. keep it simple with the versions they offer there, |
| 4 |
> with their longterm stable and slowly remove their EOL, maybe give a warning |
| 5 |
> there till its gone from kernel and then make it gone from the tree. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
That's exactly what I am proposing, but keeping everything marked |
| 8 |
"unstable" as there's no time to mark them stable before the next |
| 9 |
release comes out with fixes that should be applied. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
thanks, |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
greg k-h |
Archives