1 |
Greg KH wrote: |
2 |
> True, so we can keep around 3-4 older ebuilds if needed, per kernel |
3 |
> release. But who really does a dependency clean these days, I've never |
4 |
> done one :) So, what's the next step? Should I announce the change to |
5 |
> -dev? Anyone else really object to it? Other thoughts? thanks, greg k-h |
6 |
|
7 |
If you are referring to --depclean, I do that pretty regular here. I |
8 |
see it being recommended on -user and forums and have even seen it after |
9 |
a emerge more than once. |
10 |
|
11 |
If you are referring to something else, disregard. |
12 |
|
13 |
Dale |
14 |
|
15 |
:-) :-) |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |