1 |
>>>>> On Tue, 22 Nov 2016, Robin H Johnson wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I do however see a way forward: |
4 |
> 1. Add an additional restriction to flag distfiles with license |
5 |
> clauses as above: RESTRICT='mirror-nocost' |
6 |
> 2. DOCUMENT that any consumers of the distfiles for use cases such |
7 |
> as the above need to exclude distfiles by the above restriction. |
8 |
|
9 |
Yes, but I wonder if it would be worth the effort for the few packages |
10 |
that have such a restriction on the cost of distribution. |
11 |
|
12 |
If availability of the distfile is an issue, a possible workaround |
13 |
would be to provide a copy in the maintainer's account on dev.g.o and |
14 |
add that as a secondary entry to SRC_URI. |
15 |
|
16 |
Ulrich |