| 1 |
>>>>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Azamat Hackimov wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I'm maintainer of dev-games/aseprite package. After version 1.1.7 |
| 4 |
> developer changed license from GPL-2 to own EULA license[1]. Can I |
| 5 |
> continue to maintain this package in portage tree under these |
| 6 |
> conditions? |
| 7 |
> As I can see, we can't redistribute source code - 2(b) clause, so |
| 8 |
> there already RESTRICT="mirror". Sources are still available in |
| 9 |
> Github and author intends to continue to do so. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I don't see a problem with maintaining the package. Presumably, the |
| 12 |
license should be added to the @EULA group. And the ebuild needs |
| 13 |
RESTRICT="mirror bindist" because any built binaries cannot be |
| 14 |
distributed either. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I also agree that the free version should be kept if possible. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Ulrich |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> [1] https://github.com/aseprite/aseprite/blob/master/EULA.txt |
Archives