| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 19/11/14 09:36, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 5 |
> How does this translate to our situation with many developers |
| 6 |
> committing to a central repository? Is the latest version of the |
| 7 |
> tree the "original work", with a collective copyright of all |
| 8 |
> contributors? Or is each commit a "modified version" of the |
| 9 |
> previous? I believe that in the first case (distribution of the |
| 10 |
> original work) modification notices wouldn't be needed at all, but |
| 11 |
> that in the second case the GPL would require them. |
| 12 |
The former, I should think. But maybe we should send an email to |
| 13 |
someone at the FSF or the SFLC. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
- -- |
| 16 |
Alexander |
| 17 |
bernalex@g.o |
| 18 |
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander |
| 19 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 20 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 21 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlRsaxIACgkQRtClrXBQc7WUQAEAri1dtuaoIANuJ/Ngoc1vIYGR |
| 24 |
uVX2S/WaHSJQcWkZ6OwBAJy7hHZQNYbxCi4wgMURjKGazABivo//QAbkObk3osXl |
| 25 |
=Q+k8 |
| 26 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives