1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 14-12-12 14:24, Andrey G. Grozin wrote: |
5 |
> Hello *, |
6 |
|
7 |
Hi Andrey, |
8 |
|
9 |
> Things from the lisp overlay migrate to the main tree very slowly. |
10 |
> And even in the overlay some important new versions are absent. |
11 |
> sbcl-1.1.* for example. |
12 |
|
13 |
Indeed! None of the few Gentoo developers interested in lisp seem to |
14 |
have enough time to spare to work much on Common Lisp. |
15 |
|
16 |
> Today, I committed to the main tree |
17 |
> |
18 |
> asdf-2.26 gentoo-init-1.0 sbcl-1.1.2 |
19 |
> |
20 |
> All this stuff is pmasked. I am not a lisp expert myself, I only |
21 |
> use lisp to compile maxima and fricas. sbcl seems the best lisp for |
22 |
> this, it is fast and problem-free. So, I am really interested in |
23 |
> having recent versions of sbcl in the tree. |
24 |
|
25 |
Maybe you should consider expanding your knowledge of Common Lisp if |
26 |
you rely on software written in it a lot. None of the (other) few |
27 |
Gentoo developers interested in lisp seem to have enough of an |
28 |
investment/interest in Common Lisp at the moment to even keep SBCL |
29 |
up-to-date. |
30 |
|
31 |
> Also, it seems that there is some inconsistency in gentoo-init and |
32 |
> asdf which are available in the main tree; in the overlay, things |
33 |
> have been fixed. Moving this stuff to the main tree is, I think, |
34 |
> high priority. |
35 |
|
36 |
The only reason CL stuff is moving in the overlay is because some |
37 |
non-developers, mostly Stelian Ionescu, are interested enough to work |
38 |
on it there. Unfortunately we haven't been able to recruit any of the |
39 |
CL contributors. |
40 |
|
41 |
> gentoo-init-1.0 is from the overlay, practically verbatim (I had to |
42 |
> do minor changes to make it co-exist with 0.1 in the tree). |
43 |
> |
44 |
> asdf is from the overlay (version bumped), but there is a problem: |
45 |
> common-lisp-3 eclass is not in the tree. I simply inserted the |
46 |
> needed stuff from this eclass to the asdf ebuild. Yes, I know, this |
47 |
> is not the right thing to do. But it seems that nobody works on |
48 |
> moving this eclass to the main tree, and this blocks all further |
49 |
> progress. |
50 |
> |
51 |
> sbcl is also from the overlay, version bumped. sbcl-1.1.2 |
52 |
> successfully compiles maxima and fricas on x86 and amd64, and |
53 |
> everything seems quite good. |
54 |
> |
55 |
> So, if anybody has objections against moving these things to the |
56 |
> main tree, please, say so now, while this stuff is hard-masked. If |
57 |
> I'll hear no objections after some period, I'll unmask it. |
58 |
|
59 |
No objections from my side as long as you add yourself to the |
60 |
maintainer fields in some way. Perhaps by joining the common-lisp herd? |
61 |
|
62 |
Marijn |
63 |
|
64 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
65 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
66 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
67 |
|
68 |
iEYEARECAAYFAlDO7NYACgkQp/VmCx0OL2w/fACeLXb//yLwAe8kSY6JVCCJ4G+k |
69 |
rl8Anjdu9GlIVpx8G1pipcNuAkJJvUMe |
70 |
=ZZs9 |
71 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |