| 1 |
Dnia 2014-01-22, o godz. 09:24:55 |
| 2 |
"Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> 4) The debian debate about departing from GNU tuples (aka triplets) is here: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664257 |
| 7 |
> https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Tuples |
| 8 |
> https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/TuplesAbandoned |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Their reasons are different than ours. The concern was over |
| 11 |
> i386/486/585/686 inconsistencies and arm hard/soft float. Regarding the |
| 12 |
> later issue, gcc upstream suggested using the vendor field which is what |
| 13 |
> we do for hard/soft arm. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> 5) My recommendation is that the safest thing is to use the vendor field |
| 16 |
> since it is recognized as "arbitrary". [...] |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Well, considering that it will fix the underlying issue, you have my |
| 19 |
blessing :). If you are going to put 'gentoo' there somehow, even +2. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Best regards, |
| 23 |
Michał Górny |
Archives