| 1 |
On 01/22/2014 02:38 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dnia 2014-01-22, o godz. 09:24:55 |
| 3 |
> "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> 4) The debian debate about departing from GNU tuples (aka triplets) is here: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664257 |
| 8 |
>> https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Tuples |
| 9 |
>> https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/TuplesAbandoned |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> Their reasons are different than ours. The concern was over |
| 12 |
>> i386/486/585/686 inconsistencies and arm hard/soft float. Regarding the |
| 13 |
>> later issue, gcc upstream suggested using the vendor field which is what |
| 14 |
>> we do for hard/soft arm. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> 5) My recommendation is that the safest thing is to use the vendor field |
| 17 |
>> since it is recognized as "arbitrary". [...] |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Well, considering that it will fix the underlying issue, you have my |
| 20 |
> blessing :). If you are going to put 'gentoo' there somehow, even +2. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
Do you mean change the CHOST for each ABI to contain the abi name in the |
| 23 |
vendor field? That should work... |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Regards, |
| 27 |
Markos Chandras |
Archives