1 |
Hello, |
2 |
|
3 |
Please delete me from the list : *lists.gentoo.org |
4 |
<http://lists.gentoo.org>* |
5 |
|
6 |
Thanks, |
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
2013/12/30 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
10 |
|
11 |
> On Sunday 29 December 2013 18:56:14 Mike Frysinger wrote: |
12 |
> > so to turn your base argument around, we shouldn't be limiting Gentoo to |
13 |
> > only support CHOSTs that also select ABIs uniquely. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> also worth noting: we've been severely limiting ourselves as to the full |
16 |
> range |
17 |
> of possibilities. when we say "ABI", we've largely been focusing on the |
18 |
> most |
19 |
> common aspect. in reality, an ABI is defined by many more features like: |
20 |
> - endian (little/big) |
21 |
> - floating point (hard/soft/etc...) |
22 |
> - ISA selection (mips1/mips2/mips3/mips4/... or i386/i486/i586/i686/... or |
23 |
> sse1/sse2/mmx/3dnow!/...) |
24 |
> there are other aspects too, but these are the obvious ones that people are |
25 |
> selecting every day. people have one toolchain which can generate code for |
26 |
> all of these things merely by flag selection, not different CHOST values. |
27 |
> in |
28 |
> Gentoo we don't commonly support this as most people don't care, but it has |
29 |
> been done before. |
30 |
> -mike |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Sébastien Bertoletto |