| 1 |
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:03:04AM +0000, Adrian Sandor wrote: |
| 2 |
> Well, my concern is that for a source mirror, rsync would have to read |
| 3 |
> 300+GB of data every 4 hours, it seems a bit harsh (unless there is |
| 4 |
> some way to save/cache checksums?) |
| 5 |
I agree it's painful. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
It does seem there used to be even more than one patch to cache |
| 8 |
checksums: |
| 9 |
https://mattmccutchen.net/rsync/rsync-patches.git/tree |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
It was done twice: |
| 12 |
checksums-reading* |
| 13 |
db.diff |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I don't know why upstream didn't accept these in the end (I've submitted |
| 16 |
other patches to upstream also with no response). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 20 |
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead, Foundation Trustee |
| 21 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 22 |
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |
Archives