Re: [gentoo-musl] Re: plan9port build fails on multiple levels.

[Rendov Norra]

I've attached the patches here, but I hesitate to present them as a
solution since I'm incapable of testing them because of the segfaults
I'm experiencing with egrep.

I'll also note that the version
(e78ed7a67bbaa37dc57dfb37219f505c48755e14) is 3 years old. One big fix
that happened since then is the change of some files' extensions for
.C to .c, since they don't compile as .C .

As for why I'm interested in p9p, it's a feasible replacement base
system in place of GNU--being small but still functional--, and sam
and acme are useful editors.

On 6/30/17, Anthony G. Basile <basile@××××××××××.net> wrote:
> On 6/30/17 3:02 AM, parazyd@××××.org wrote:
>> Do share them. plan9port doesn't compile on amd64 either.
>>
>> On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Rendov Norra wrote:
>>
>>> I have patches to fix the first two issues (or at least they compile),
>>> but they're very hacky as I'm not an experienced coder.
>
> Excellent, ignore my last message.  If you open a bug report at
> bugs.gentoo.org, describe the problem and upload the patches and I'll
> put it on the tree.  I also maintain plan9port so I can fix it directly.
>
> Having said that, I'm curious why people are interested in plan9port?
>
>>>
>>> On 6/29/17, Rendov Norra <tsobf242@×××××.com> wrote:
>>>> I should also note that this is on ARM
>>>>
>>>> On 6/29/17, Rendov Norra <tsobf242@×××××.com> wrote:
>>>>> It fails at building its thread library, it fails at building
>>>>> lib9/dirread, and I'm not sure if this is related at all but egrep
>>>>> segfaults and kills the build.
>>>>>
>
> --
> Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
> Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
> E-Mail    : basile@××××××××××.net
> GnuPG FP  : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB  DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
> GnuPG ID  : F52D4BBA
>
>
>