| 1 |
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:28 PM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, Matthew Thode wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> What I'd like to see (not fully thought out and all) is the |
| 5 |
>> following. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>> CoC is not enforced on the list by comrel, but comrel can report |
| 8 |
>> what they beleive to be CoC violations to the Trustees. The Trustees |
| 9 |
>> can take action if they believe necessary. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I don't think that adding a further indirection for disciplinary |
| 12 |
> measures would be helpful. At the least, it would delay any actions. |
| 13 |
> So, I would suggest to leave this to ComRel, and if you absolutely |
| 14 |
> must, make trustees rather then council the instance of appeal for the |
| 15 |
> gentoo-nfp list. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Ulrich (not speaking for the council) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
My opinion is that -nfp is a special case |
Archives